Home » Cadillac Lyriq Not Eligible For $7,500 Federal EV Tax Credit

Cadillac Lyriq Not Eligible For $7,500 Federal EV Tax Credit

Cadillac Lyriq Not Eligible For $7,500 Federal EV Tax Credit

The Federal EV tax credit is intended to encourage consumers to purchase electric vehicles, furnishing a $7,500 tax break with the purchase or lease of an eligible EV. The U.S. Treasury and IRS recently revealed new guidelines for vehicles to be eligible for this tax credit, and surprisingly, the Cadillac Lyriq received a strange classification that renders it ineligible. 

As it turns out, the Lyriq is not classified as a utility vehicle, thus placing it outside the parameters necessary for its buyers to receive the tax credit. Instead, the U.S. Treasury considers the Lyriq a “passenger vehicle,” meaning that its retail price cannot exceed $55,000 in order to qualify for the tax credit benefits. Currently, the Lyriq’s starting MSRP is $62,990 for the base Luxury trim.

Understandably, Cadillac’s parent company, General Motors, is not satisfied with this classification, as it could negatively impact sales of the luxury electric crossover.

“We are addressing these concerns with Treasury and hope that forthcoming guidance on vehicle classifications will provide the needed clarity to consumers and dealers, as well as regulators and manufacturers,” a GM representative was quoted as saying. The automaker also argued that the Treasury should utilize criteria and processes similar to the Department of Energy in order to “[drive] consistency across existing federal policy and clarity for consumers.”

It’s worth noting that the Cadillac Lyriq was not the only electric vehicle to receive an odd classification. The Ford Mustang Mach-E, Ford Escape PHEV and Lincoln Corsair are also considered passenger vehicles, not utility vehicles. The Tesla Model Y is not considered an SUV with the two-row, five-passenger layout, but its counterpart with a third row and seven-passenger seating capacity is. The Volkswagen ID.4 is also not considered an SUV, but gains the classification when outfitted with all-wheel-drive. 

For reference, here is section 523.5 from the Code of Federal Regulations pertaining to the federal EV tax credit:

A non-passenger automobile means an automobile that is not a passenger automobile or a work truck and includes vehicles described in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section:

  • (a) An automobile designed to perform at least one of the following functions:
    • (1) Transport more than 10 persons;
    • (2) Provide temporary living quarters;
    • (3) Transport property on an open bed;
    • (4) Provide, as sold to the first retail purchaser, greater cargo-carrying than passenger-carrying volume, such as in a cargo van; if a vehicle is sold with a second-row seat, its cargo-carrying volume is determined with that seat installed, regardless of whether the manufacturer has described that seat as optional; or
    • (5) Permit expanded use of the automobile for cargo-carrying purposes or other nonpassenger-carrying purposes through:
      • (i) For non-passenger automobiles manufactured prior to model year 2012, the removal of seats by means installed for that purpose by the automobile’s manufacturer or with simple tools, such as screwdrivers and wrenches, so as to create a flat, floor level, surface extending from the forwardmost point of installation of those seats to the rear of the automobile’s interior; or
      • (ii) For non-passenger automobiles manufactured in model year 2008 and beyond, for vehicles equipped with at least 3 rows of designated seating positions as standard equipment, permit expanded use of the automobile for cargo-carrying purposes or other nonpassenger-carrying purposes through the removal or stowing of foldable or pivoting seats so as to create a flat, leveled cargo surface extending from the forwardmost point of installation of those seats to the rear of the automobile’s interior.
  • (b) An automobile capable of off-highway operation, as indicated by the fact that it:
  • (1)
    • (i) Has 4-wheel drive; or
    • (ii) Is rated at more than 6,000 pounds gross vehicle weight; and
  • (2) Has at least four of the following characteristics calculated when the automobile is at curb weight, on a level surface, with the front wheels parallel to the automobile’s longitudinal centerline, and the tires inflated to the manufacturer’s recommended pressure –
    • (i) Approach angle of not less than 28 degrees.
    • (ii) Breakover angle of not less than 14 degrees.
    • (iii) Departure angle of not less than 20 degrees.
    • (iv) Running clearance of not less than 20 centimeters.
    • (v) Front and rear axle clearances of not less than 18 centimeters each.

The Treasury defends its position, stating that its decisions are based on fuel economy standards “which are pre-existing – and longstanding – EPA regulations that manufacturers are very familiar with. These standards offer clear criteria for delineating between cars and SUVs.”

Want the latest on all things Cadillac as it surges into its all-electric future? Then subscribe to Cadillac Society for Cadillac Lyriq news and to-the-minute Cadillac news coverage. We also invite you to join the latest discussions in our Cadillac forums and Cadillac Lyriq forum.

Written by
Alexandra is a Colorado-based journalist with a passion for all things involving horsepower, be it automotive or equestrian.


  1. Ironic isn’t it? If they doubled the size of the battery – the car would be over 6,000 lbs. It would have a 500 mile driving range, and the batteries would be partially paid for by the tax credit…

  2. I have been a Cadillac owner in my 30s,my 40’s, my50’s, my 60’s and now in my 70’s. Believe me, I could tell the Federal Government what is a car and what is an SUV. My Devilles were cars, my Fleetwoods were cars, My DHS was a car, My DTS was a car and my present Cadillac, a 2019 XTS is a cars. The Lyriq is not a var, but an SUV. I think of an SUV like a truck. But ALWAYS A Cadillac for me.

    • This apparently shows you that the Government doesn’t know what it is doing. Just totally incompetent!!!
      No other way to explain this foolishness!!!!

  3. BS

  4. What else can the government do to stop Lyriq electric Cadillac sales? I have owned or leased Cadillacs for 60 years and now I’m trading my Escalade truck for a Lyriq “SUV” because they want me to pay $100 to fill the tank with gas, almost $70 more than 2 years ago! What’s next?… a luxury tax? GM needs to reintroduce an EXT EV this year!

    • Makes no sense, so typical of the federal government

  5. This bureaucratic nonsense will definitely cause me to re-evaluate my decision to take delivery of my Lyriq IF and when I am notified it will be available. I’ve owned or leased 7 Cadillac s over the years. I try to buy American, go green, “do the right thing” and the government “moves the goal posts” and “shoots me in the foot!”

    • None of the real competitors will have the rebate either.

    • I am waiting for a Lyriq too but may pull the plug and ask for a refund when it arrives…I had to put down $1000 (MSRP) in signed contract but they are passing the 120 delivery date so that contract can be cancelled by me for a refund since the agreed terms were not met. I am ticked more at the inept governemnt polcies more than Cadillac however. Just goes to show how screwed up all these government agencies are.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

Lost Password

Please enter your username or email address. You will receive a link to create a new password via email.

Sign Up